State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior Court
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McGREGOR, Presiding Judge.
In this special action the State, joined by defendant Mendevil, asserts that the trial judge abused his discretion by requiring both the defendant and the State to give reasons for all peremptory strikes, without requiring any prima facie showing of purposeful discrimination and absent objection by the opposing party. For the reasons stated below, we accept jurisdiction and grant relief.
I
The State filed criminal charges against the Real Parties in Interest, Mario Mendevil and Jose Fernando Vega-Vasoco. In October 1994, the State, aware that this trial judge…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Payne v. GundyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. Paris-SheldonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State v. RubioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- State v. UrreaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.