Legal Opinion

State v. Sircy

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1964PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

The State has appealed from a judgment of the Trial Court sustaining a motion of the defendant in error to suppress certain evidence which was essential to the State’s case. The defendant in error, Sircy, was under indictment for' the offense ’ of possession of burglarious instruments, in violation of T.C.A. sec. 39-908. The evidence suppressed consists of seven “lock picks”, which are pieces of steel wire bent at right angles about one-quarter inch from one end and bent at the other end and wrapped with adhesive tape to form a handle. The record shows these “lock picks” are used primarily to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Clark & Fay, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  2. State v. BassTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Seals v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Lawson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Mascari v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America Local Union No. 667Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MeeksCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  2. Whited v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
  3. Albert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Dunn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. State v. BonhartTennessee Supreme Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API