Legal Opinion

People v. Lathrop

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 16, 1958PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

There is ample evidence in the record to establish that section 54 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law was substantially complied with by the placement of speed signs in such a manner and at such locations as to afford this defendant fair notice of the limits of speed within the village (see People v. Burmann, 307 N. Y. 871). Proof of the presence or absence of exit speed signs would have no bearing on defendant’s conviction for the speeding violation which was committed within the village limits.

The question as to the validity of that portion of the ordinance which provides that an offender shall…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Alpha Portland Cement Co. v. KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. People v. MancusoNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Teeval Co. v. SternNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Bronx Gas & Electric Co. v. MaltbieNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. People v. BurmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1954

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re Daniel C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. People v. CooperJustice Court of Town of Rhinebeck · 1981
  3. People v. HallJustice Court of Town of Ossining · 1981
  4. People v. NorthrupNew York Justice Court · 1988
  5. People v. StoneKensington Village Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API