Legal Opinion

People v. Williams

California Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 2004No. S110377PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*400Opinion

KENNARD, J.

In People v. Tassell (1984) 36 Cal.3d 77 [201 Cal.Rptr. 567, 679 P.2d 1] (Tassell), this court held that when imposing a determinate sentence on a recidivist offender convicted of multiple offenses, a trial court is to impose an enhancement for a prior conviction only once to increase the aggregate term, and not separately to increase the principal or subordinate term imposed for each new offense.1 (Tassell, at pp. 89-92.) Here, the Court of Appeal concluded that Tassell’s holding does not apply to multiple indeterminate third strike sentences imposed under the “Three…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. EwoldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. GutierrezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. TassellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. People v. BarraganCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API