In the Interest of K.E.A.

OPINION

Opinion By

Chief Justice WRIGHT.

This is an appeal of the trial court’s August 12, 2011 order on appellant’s petition to modify the parent/child relationship and appellee’s petition to enforce the property award. Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. She claims the trial court’s order is interlocutory because it leaves to be determined both the amount of child support she must pay appellant and the amount of net monthly income appellant must pay her.

Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d…