Legal Opinion

Szymanski v. Szymanski

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMichael Catalano, J.

The defendant moves for “ an order vacating the plaintiff’s notice to take defendant’s testimony ”.

The notice, dated January 19, 1959, states: “The matters upon which the said defendant, Nestor Szymanski is to be examined are all of the relevant and material allegations of fact put in issue by the pleadings of this action.” It also seeks to have furnished at the examination certain documents concerning the defendant’s financial position and net worth.

The defendant contends that an examination before trial in a contested matrimonial action is against public policy.

It is not disputed that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tausik v. TausikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  2. Field v. FieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  3. Immerman v. ImmermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  4. Shatz v. ShatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  5. Appelbaum v. AppelbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pizzo v. PizzoNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Burch v. BurchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API