Legal Opinion

Pizzo v. Pizzo

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDomenick Gabbielli, J.

In this separation action, the defendant husband seeks to examine the plaintiff before trial, pursuant to the provisions of rule 121-a of the Rules of Civil Practice, by notice of examination upon ‘ ‘ all of the relevant and material allegations of fact put in issue by the pleadings of this action

The plaintiff now seeks to vacate the notice of examination upon the ground that it is against public policy arid that it being *1023a matrimonial action, the defendant is not entitled to a general examination.

It has been the general rule that in matrimonial actions, such examinations will be denied…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tausik v. TausikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  2. Field v. FieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  3. Immerman v. ImmermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  4. Szymanski v. SzymanskiNew York Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. MaxwellNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Burch v. BurchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API