Legal Opinion

Latterman v. United States

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 11, 1988No. Civ. A. 85-2828PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DIAMOND, District Judge.

This is a tax refund action in which the plaintiff-taxpayer seeks a refund of certain interest accrued on an excise tax imposed pursuant to I.R.C. § 4975(c) (1982). Although the plaintiff acknowledges liability for the excise tax, he challenges the defendant’s statutory authority under the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) to impose the accrued interest.

Presently before the court are cross-motions for summary judgment. For reasons set forth below, we conclude that the defendant was authorized by the Code to impose the interest payment upon plaintiff and,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Trans Alaska Pipeline Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. New Jersey v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. (In Re Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp.)District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Earl M. Latterman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API