Legal Opinion
Nathan Sanford v. Christopher Joseph, et al.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided March 13, 2026No. 3:25-cv-00702Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 NATHAN SANFORD, Case No.: 3:25-cv-00702-MMD-CSD 4 Plaintiff Order 5 v. Re: ECF No. 4, 4-1 6 CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH, et al., 7 Defendants 8 9 Plaintiff, who is an inmate in the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections 10 (NDOC), has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) (ECF No. 1) and a pro se 11 complaint (ECF No. 4-1).1 12 I. IFP APPLICATION 13 A person may be granted permission to proceed IFP if the person “submits an affidavit 14 that includes a statement of all assets such [person] possesses [and] that the person…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.