Legal Opinion

State v. Steadman

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 22, 1948No. 16149PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Baker, Chief Justice.

The appellant, Ida E. Steadman, was indicted in the Court of General Sessions for Richland County under two sections of the Code — Sections 1112 and 1113, reading respectively as follows:

“Any person who .shall administer to any woman with child, of prescribe for any such woman, or suggest to or advise or procure her to take, any medicine, substance, drug or thing whatever, or who shall use or employ, or advise the use or employment of, any instrument or other means of force whatever, with intent thereby to cause or procure the miscarriage or abortion or premature labor of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . ForteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Mitchell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879
  3. State v. . JordonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. Commonwealth v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1845

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HollmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  2. State v. SteadmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  3. West v. McCoySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  4. Walsingham v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  5. State v. HuttoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API