Legal Opinion

State v. Diggs

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 2009No. 27,812PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WECHSLER, Judge.

{1} Defendants Jonathan Diggs and Rebecca Miller appeal in advance of their trial from the district court’s denial of their motions to dismiss on double jeopardy grounds. We consider whether the New Mexico Constitution and double jeopardy statute prohibit the State from prosecuting Defendants for child abuse because the Children, Youth and Families Department (CYFD) previously investigated Defendants for child abuse and the Acoma Pueblo tribal court previously held a custody hearing on the same issues. We hold that there was no double jeopardy violation and affirm.

BACKGR…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. NunezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State Ex Rel. Schwartz v. KennedyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. SaizNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. JimNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Water Well Solutions Service Group Inc. v. Consolidated Insurance CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Water Well Solutions Service Group Inc. v. Consolidated Insurance CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API