Legal Opinion
State v. Jim
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided October 18, 1988No. 10425PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
Defendant appeals a conviction for one count of great bodily injury by a motor vehicle, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 66-8-101 (Repl.Pamp.1987). He raises three issues: (1) whether the prosecution improperly used one of its peremptory challenges to excuse a member of defendant’s race; (2) whether the trial court improperly excused a potential juror for cause; and (3) whether the statute under which he was charged and convicted is unconstitutionally vague. Defendant also renews his motion to amend his docketing statement to assert three additional issues, first raised in…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Daniel Chalan, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Oscar ClemonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Russell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CalhounCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. MooreNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. James M.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. DominguezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.