Bisogno v. Connecticut State Board of Labor Relations
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The Cleaners, Dyers and Laundry Workers Union Local 364 of the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, A.F.L.-C.I.O., hereinafter called the union, filed with the defendant three separate charges that the plaintiff had engaged and was engaging in unfair labor practices. In May, 1960, the agent of the defendant consolidated the charges and issued a complaint against the plaintiff, alleging in substance that the plaintiff had discharged from his employ Carlos Roldan, Emily Gunther and Mabel James because they had joined and assisted the union and engaged in concerted activities for the purpose…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. PundySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Imperial Laundry, Inc. v. Connecticut State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- L. Suzio Construction Co. v. Connecticut State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
3Cited by7 opinions
- Town of Winchester v. Connecticut State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Town of New Canaan v. Connecticut State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Success Village Apartments, Inc. v. Local 376Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Pelletier v. WhiteConnecticut Superior Court · 1976
- Local 1186, American Federation of State v. Connecticut State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.