Legal Opinion

United States v. Norris

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided May 22, 2007No. 1:06-cv-00243PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HOLSCHUH, District Judge.

On October 31, 2006, a grand jury returned a six-count Indictment, charging Defendant Gary P. Norris with knowingly and willfully misapplying, embezzling, abstracting, or purloining funds of Home National Bank (“HNB”) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 656. This case is currently before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Indictment for Preindictment Delay (R. at 18). An evidentiary hearing was held on March 12, 2007, and both the Government and Defendant have subsequently submitted supplemental memoran-da on whether delay in prosecuting…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. United States v. GouveiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. PannellOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. State v. ErhardtOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API