Legal Opinion

People v. Severance

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 5, 2006No. C048410PublishedCited by 14 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROBIE, J.

In a prior appeal, this court remanded this case for trial on defendant Victor Lee Severance’s plea of not guilty by reason of insanity. At the beginning of that trial, the court denied defendant’s belated request to represent himself. 1 At the end of the trial, the court granted the prosecution’s motion for a directed verdict of sanity.

In this appeal, defendant contends the trial court erred in denying his request to represent himself and in directing a verdict of sanity. We conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s belated request for…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. People v. LawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. SkinnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. DobsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. People v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. People v. BlakelyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. People v. DobsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Flores v. LiuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API