Legal Opinion

People v. Blakely

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 16, 2014No. D066381PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

Anthony John Blakely pleaded not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity to assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, 1 §§ 245, subd. (a)(1), 1192.7, subd. (c); count 1) and robbery (§ 211; count 2). The jury convicted him of both counts. After the evidence was presented in the sanity phase of the trial, the court granted the People’s motion for a directed verdict of sanity.

Blakely appeals, contending the court erred in directing a verdict of sanity. We conclude the court did not err in removing the issue of Blakely’s sanity from the jury. As set forth in People…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. People v. LawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. SkinnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. StressCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. People v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. People v. Galvez CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. Hughes CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. People v. NanceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API