Legal Opinion

People v. Clayton

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 18, 2009No. 08SA353PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Mullarkey

I. Introduction

The prosecution brings this interlocutory appeal pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1 and section 16-2-102(2), C.R.S. (2008), challenging the trial court's order suppressing statements made by Defendant Brian Seott Clayton to police officers after he signed a written waiver of his Miranda rights. The trial court found that his waiver was not valid and granted Clayton's motion to suppress. After reviewing the record and the video of the recorded interview, we conclude that Clayton validly waived his Miranda rights and that his statements should not have been suppressed. Accordingly, we…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. People v. MathenySupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. People v. ValdezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  5. People v. MaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. MartinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  2. People v. Vicente-SontayColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. People v. BryantColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. v. RaiderColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. People v. MacLarenColorado Court of Appeals · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API