Harris v. Schmitt
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ESPINOSA, Presiding Judge.
Following a Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) hearing, the administrative hearing officer found that police had reasonable grounds to believe that appellant Edward N. Harris had been driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs and that he had refused to submit to or failed to provide a urine sample as requested. Consequently, the hearing officer suspended Harris’s driving license pursuant to AR.S. § 28-691. Harris filed suit in Maricopa County Superior Court seeking judicial review under the Administrative Review Act. A.R.S. §§ 12-901…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Campbell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Sherrill v. Department of TransportationArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Ontiveros v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Commonwealth v. MedalisCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Wieseler v. PrinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.