Roby v. City of Watertown
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHenry A. Hudson, J.
The Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation and the New York Telephone Company, third-party defendants, have moved by separate motions, which were argued together, to dismiss the third-party complaint as to each of said third-party defendants.
The plaintiff instituted its action against the City of Watertown alone. The allegation of negligence contained in the complaint is found in paragraph ‘ ‘ 8 ’’which reads as follows: ‘6 8. The negligence of defendant, its agents, servants or employees, among other things, consisted in negligently constructing the said street, sewers or storm sewers, gutters,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McFall v. Compagnie Maritime Belge (Lloyd Royal) S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Kile v. Riefler Bros. ContractorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Middleton v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Messaro v. Long Island Rail Road Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Green v. Hudson Shoring Co.New York Supreme Court · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harper v. Dalrymple Gravel & Contracting Company, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962