Legal Opinion

State Highway Department v. Whitehurst

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 18, 1964No. 40718PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhardt, Judge.

Though the charge is correct as an abstract principle of law (see Code § 36-505), we think the exception is meritorious. This court dealt with a charge similar in nature in State Hwy. Dept. v. Weldon, 107 Ga. App. 98 (129 SE2d 396) and held it to be error. The landowner urges that there are differences in the charge there and here requiring a different result. The only difference in the charge in Weldon and that with which we deal here is that here the court added at the end of the second paragraph the phrase “as shown by the evidence.” It is insisted here that the addition…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Central Georgia Power Co. v. CornwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. State Highway Department v. WeldonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. State Highway Department v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Schoolcraft v. DeKalb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Department of Transportation v. KatzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. State Highway Department v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  4. State Highway Department v. FutchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  5. State Highway Department v. RutlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API