Legal Opinion
Department of Transportation v. Katz
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 1, 1983No. 66714, 66716, 66715, 66717PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Judge.
Pursuant to OCGA § 32-3-4 et seq. (Code Ann. § 95-2804 et seq.), the Department of Transportation (DOT) filed a proceeding in rem, condemning property owned by the condemnees which was located adjacent to an expressway service road. As provided by OCGA § 32-3-4 (Code Ann. § 95-2804), condemnees timely filed a notice of appeal. Approximately one year later, DOT filed a second proceeding in rem, condemning property owned by the condemnees which was located immediately adjacent to the property constituting the subject matter of the first condemnation action. Condemnees again timely…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. DatrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Theo v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Zuber Lumber Co. v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- State Highway Department v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Schoolcraft v. DeKalb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Department of Transportation v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Department of Transportation v. MendelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Department of Transportation v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Circle K General, Inc. v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Gunn v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.