Legal Opinion

State v. Besk

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 12, 1994No. 93-126PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The defendant, Joseph Besk, was convicted of three counts of aggravated felonious sexual assault involving two boys under the age of thirteen. See RSA 632-A:2, XI (1986) (current version at RSA 632-A:2,1(1) (Supp. 1993)). Besk appeals the Superior Court’s (Perkins, J.) order, pursuant to the rape shield law, RSA 632-A:6 *413(1986) (current version at RSA 632-A:6, II (Supp. 1993)), prohibiting him from cross-examining one of the boys, Stephen, about an allegation that Stephen had sexually molested Besk’s son. We affirm.

Prior to trial, the State moved to exclude any evidence that Stephen had…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. HowardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  2. State v. SantanaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  3. State v. FennellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  4. State v. GouletSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  5. Appeal of City of FranklinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HigginsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  2. State v. Jeffries (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. CuniSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  4. Grant v. DemskieDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  5. State v. SonthikoummaneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API