Huckabee v. Montgomery
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtStuktevaNt, J.
This is an action for assault and battery. The plaintiff had a verdict and judgment below and the case is here on the defendant’s exceptions.
In his brief the defendant states that the plaintiff introduced several photographs in evidence, and that; “numbers 5 and 7 were allowed as exhibits by the court and the defendant excepted to their allowance as exhibits. Tr. 36, 37, 38, 39, 40.” This method of referring to questions mentioned as presented by the exceptions is followed throughout the defendant’s brief. This is inadequate briefing. The brief should contain a clear statement of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- West Rutland Trust Co. v. HoustonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
- Ellison v. ColbySupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. TeitleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952
- Bressett v. O'HaraSupreme Court of Vermont · 1950
- Leonard v. HendersonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1953
- Isabelle v. Proctor HospitalSupreme Court of Vermont · 1975