Federal Rubber Co. v. King
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Appeal; from Fulton superior court—Judge Bell.' April 8, 1912.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.
The decision of this case in the court below depended entirely upon the construction of the contract, and the plaintiff in error insists that the trial judge erred in two respects in the construction which he gave it. We are of the opinion that the judge properly construed the contract, and that the evidence as a whole amply supports the finding, of the jury. The plaintiff sought to recover for breach of an express warranty alleged to have been made by an agent of the defendant. There is no dispute that the warranty was made. The two real questions in the case are: (1) Was the Dunham Rubber…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Furst Bros. v. Commercial BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- National Bank v. GoodyearSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Nutter v. WheelerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1874
- Snelling v. Arbuckle Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Taxes, Aiea Dairy, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1963
- Marrinan Medical Supply, Inc. v. Ft. Dodge Serum Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- In re ThomasDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1916
- Buffington v. SasserCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Studebaker Corp. of America v. HansonWyoming Supreme Court · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.