Legal Opinion

National Bank v. Goodyear

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 23, 1893PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Debtor and Creditor. Notice. Mortgage. Contract. Bailment. Agency. Before Judge Roney. Richmond superior court. February 23, 1892. On December 16, "1891, A. "W. Goodyear executed a mortgage to the National Bank of Augusta, the Emerson & Eisher Company, Caroline E. Goodyear, and a number of other parties, all of whom were creditors of the mortgagor in various amounts.

Read the full summary

Debtor and Creditor. Notice. Mortgage. Contract. Bailment. Agency. Before Judge Roney. Richmond superior court. February 23, 1892. On December 16, "1891, A. "W. Goodyear executed a mortgage to the National Bank of Augusta, the Emerson & Eisher Company, Caroline E. Goodyear, and a number of other parties, all of whom were creditors of the mortgagor in various amounts. The mortgage recites that the mortgagor is indebted to the National Bank of Augusta $3,700, represented by five notes of dates running from October 22d to November 14th, 1891, some due at thirty and some at sixty days; that he is…

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

1. It is clear from the facts appearing in the bill of exceptions and transcript of the record, when closely! scrutinized, that the mortgage executed by Goodyear-to the bank, together with the Emerson & Fisher' Company and several others of his creditors, did not embrace or cover the goods now in controversy. And it is equally clear that the bill of sale subsequently *722executed by him to' the bank alone, was not designed or understood to cover this disputed property in addition to the property embraced in the mortgage; for the consideration of the bill of sale, as shown…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fosdick v. SchallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Heryford v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. United States v. New Orleans RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Myer v. Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Hays v. Jordan & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In re Columbus Buggy Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  2. Arbuckle Bros. v. KirkpatrickTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Rhodes & Son Furniture Co. v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Furst Bros. v. Commercial BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Norris v. Boston Music Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API