Legal Opinion
Vogt Bros. Manufacturing Co. v. Stansbury
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided May 3, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CULLEN, Commissioner.
C. B. Stansbury brought action against Vogt Brothers Manufacturing Company to recover upon quantum meruit a reasonable amount of compensation for services alleged to have been performed by him in assisting Vogt Brothers to obtain a contract with the *789United States Air Force for the manufacture of bomb racks. The action was based upon an alleged oral agreement under which Stansbury was to represent Vogt Brothers at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, in Dayton, Ohio, and which provided that if he was successful in obtaining a contract for them, a “satisfactory settlement” of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tool Co. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Mitchell v. Flintkote Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Le John Manufacturing Company v. Dwight Webb, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Bradley v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- United States v. Paddock. In Re Globe Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Weitzel v. Brown-Neil CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1957
- Town of Mannford v. WatsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964