Legal Opinion

Garrison v. Garrison

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 4, 1984No. 8418SC59PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

At the outset we note that the judgment from which the appeal is taken does not dispose of all the claims and is interlocutory. The Court did not make a finding pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 54(b) that there is no reason for delay. We hear the appeal within our discretion.

The appellee contends that testimony by Erika K. Garrison that the money advanced by the plaintiff was a gift and it was not intended by the parties that the note be paid is barred by the parol evidence rule. He argues that without this evidence there is not a genuine issue to a material fact and he is entitled to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. BORDEN, INCORPORATED v. BrowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Bank v. Moore.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Kindler v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Consolidated Vending Co. v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Bank of Varina v. SlaughterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DRAPKIN v. MJALLIDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API