Legal Opinion

Mooneyham v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 11, 1925No. 15323PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. A passenger on a railroad whose point of destination is on the line of a connecting carrier, and who is traveling on a through ticket calling for immediate and continuous passage to destination upon the next train of the connecting carrier leaving the junction point for the point of destination, still preserves his status as a passenger when, *407after leaving the train at the junction point, he continues to wait there in the waiting-room of the depot, for the purpose of continuing his journey, in accordance with the terms of his contract of passage, upon the next train of the connecting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Riley v. Wrightsville & Tennille RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Smith v. Seaboard Air-line RailwayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  3. Huggins v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grant v. HartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Watts v. Colonial Stages Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  3. Delta Air Corporation v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  4. Nashville, Chattanooga & Saint Louis Railway v. MooneyhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API