Herman v. Deming
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Bill to foreclose a mortgage of real estate; brought to the Superior Court in Litchfield County. Facts found by a committee and’ a decree of foreclosure passed by Martin, J. Motion in error by Lois Scott, one of the respondents. The facts are fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtPardee, J.
On the 31st day of January, 1863, John H. Scott and George N. Cooper executed and delivered their joint promissory note for sixty-six hundred dollars to Samuel S. Robbins, and to secure the payment thereof John II. Scott and Lois his wife, Peter Cooper, and Polly his wife, George N. Cooper and Charles D. Deming, on the same day jointly executed and delivered to Robbins a mortgage deed of divers parcels and tracts of land, some of which were wholly the property of one of the signers of the deed and some the property of others. The petitioner is now the owner of the note. The deed specifically…
2Cited by9 opinions
- DeWolf v. A. & W. Sprague Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1881
- Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co. v. Puritan Laundry, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Fetes v. O'LaughlinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Higgins v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Greene v. A. & W. Sprague Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.