Legal Opinion

Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. Tinney

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 26, 2000No. 1982136PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case involves the failure of a safety device known as a "rear-impact guard" that was attached to a cargo trailer owned by Schneider National Carriers, Inc. ("Schneider"). On April 17, 1995, Kenneth Tinney was driving an automobile on Interstate Highway 20 when he rear-ended the cargo trailer owned by Schneider. The rear-impact guard failed, and Tinney was injured.

Tinney sued Schneider. (He also sued Alfa Mutual Insurance Company and Wabash National Corporation ("Wabash"). Neither of those defendants is a party to this appeal.) The gravamen of his complaint was that the rear-impact guard…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foster v. Greer and Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Cates v. BushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  3. Brown v. Whitaker Contracting Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  4. Sho-Me Motor Lodges v. JEHLE-SLAUSON CONST.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Goldome Credit Corp. v. PlayerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  2. Bagley v. Mazda Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Baugus v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. Rogers v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  5. Wilson v. TengSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API