Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Florida Bar v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 24, 1971No. 39842PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The Referee found Respondent guilty of violation of Article XI, Rule 11.02(2) of the Integration Rule, 32 F.S.A., Canons 10 and 11 of the Canons of Professional Ethics, 32 F.S.A. and Rule 1 of the Additional Rules Governing the Conduct of Attorneys in Florida, 32 F.S.A. He recommended Respondent be suspended from the practice of law in Florida for not less than five years. The Board of Governors of The Florida Bar concurred in the Referee’s findings of fact and guilt, but recommended that he be suspended for one year.

The testimony is conflicting and confusing. The questionable behavior arose…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carolina Lumber Company v. DanielDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957
  2. London Operating Co. v. Continental Construction Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. BrattonSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  2. Florida BarSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  3. The Florida Bar v. CONSOLIDATED BUS., ETC.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API