Legal Opinion

Barnet v. Horwitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 12, 1951PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover brokerage commissions, order of the County Court, Westchester County, denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. The counterclaim on its face does not set forth a cause of action and in any event no factual showing is made which would indicate that a triable issue exists. There is no dispute that plaintiff has earned his commission as a broker in the amount set forth in the complaint. The affidavit in opposition is made by an attorney who does not reveal personal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Favole v. GalloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  2. City Savings Bank of Brooklyn v. TorroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Di Sabato v. SoffesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  2. Israelson v. RubinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  3. Schwartz v. Sar Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Varone v. CalarcoNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Fauci v. MilanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API