Morgan v. Kiff
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Gunter, Justice.
This appeal is from a habeas corpus judgment remanding the appellant to custody. During the pendency of this appeal, the appellant has been paroled and is now serving the balance of his sentence on parole. However, that fact does not moot the appeal, because still prevailing are the balance of the sentence to be served on parole, and the conditions attached to parole, which if violated would result in reconfinement.
In his habeas corpus application the appellant attacked his conviction on the ground that it was procured through the introduction and use of evidence at the trial…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State PenitentiarySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. MatthewsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Berry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Ferguson v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Cherry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Jacobs v. HopperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.