Jackman v. Lord
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Patrick Jackman against Franklin B.Lord and the Consolidated Gas Company. Defendant Lord appeals from an order denying his motion to make the complaint more definite and certain.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.
This action was brought to recover for injuries caused by an explosion, the plaintiff being at the time in the public streets of the city of New York. The complaint alleges the incorporation of the defendant the Consolidated Gas Company, and that the defendant Lord was at the time of the explosion the owner of the premises No. 409 Grand street; that on the 16th of August, 1889, the plaintiff was lawfully on the public highway in the city of New York known as “Grand Street, ” at the corner of Clinton, when he was injured by being hit by some object thrown from said premises by an explosion of…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Lykiardopoulo v. New Orleans & C. R., Light & PowerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Peterson v. EighmieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Dumar v. Witherbee, Sherman & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Johnson v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Rouget v. HaightNew York Supreme Court · 1890
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.