Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Williams v. Kroger Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 19, 1999No. A99A1558Published

1ConcurrenceRuffin, Judge

I concur in the result reached by the majority and in the analysis in Division 1. I cannot agree, however, with the analysis in Division 2.

During voir dire, the trial judge apparently told the prospective jurors that juries — not courts — were responsible for awarding excessive verdicts in personal injury cases. After the plaintiff’s attorney objected, the trial judge explained that he felt he needed to educate the jury. The majority found no error because “[t]he court corrected a false impression held by jurors with a simple statement of fact.” I believe the trial judge’s remark was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Decker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Bonner v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Edmonds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. FRANKLIN LIFE INSURANCE v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  5. Grissett v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API