Legal Opinion

Stufflebeme v. Jack

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 26, 1952No. 10092PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUGHES, Justice.

H. S. Jack, Sr., appellee, doing business under the name of Dayton Pop-up Sprinkling Systems of Dallas, sued appellants, B. A. and L. Sidney Stufilebeme, for breach of a written contract to pay appellee for repairs made by him on sprinkling systems installed by appellants in Dallas. The form of the suit was in the nature of a suit upon a sworn account. When all the evidence was in the trial court, at appellee’s request, instructed the jury to return a verdict for appellee. This was done and judgment thereupon rendered for appellee for $1229.69, the amount of repairs claimed,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cochran v. Wool Growers Central Storage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Simonds v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Hunter v. Gulf Production Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Hoffer v. Eastland Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Childress v. First State Bank of BarnhartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Surety Corporation v. DabneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  2. Bellmead State Bank, Waco v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  3. Portland Flying Service, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  4. Portland Flying Service, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  5. Stufflebeme v. JackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API