Stufflebeme v. Jack
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
HUGHES, Justice.
H. S. Jack, Sr., appellee, doing business under the name of Dayton Pop-up Sprinkling Systems of Dallas, sued appellants, B. A. and L. Sidney Stufilebeme, for breach of a written contract to pay appellee for repairs made by him on sprinkling systems installed by appellants in Dallas. The form of the suit was in the nature of a suit upon a sworn account. When all the evidence was in the trial court, at appellee’s request, instructed the jury to return a verdict for appellee. This was done and judgment thereupon rendered for appellee for $1229.69, the amount of repairs claimed,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cochran v. Wool Growers Central Storage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- Simonds v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
- Hunter v. Gulf Production Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Hoffer v. Eastland Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Childress v. First State Bank of BarnhartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- National Surety Corporation v. DabneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Bellmead State Bank, Waco v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Portland Flying Service, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
- Portland Flying Service, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
- Stufflebeme v. JackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952