Legal Opinion
Stufflebeme v. Jack
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 26, 1952No. 10092Published
1Opinion of the Court
253 S.W.2d 459 (1952)
STUFFLEBEME et al.
v.
JACK.
No. 10092.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin.
November 26, 1952.
Rehearing Denied December 17, 1952.
Burford, Ryburn, Hincks & Ford, Sam P. Burford by Roy L. Cole, all of Dallas, for appellants.
Chas. Romick, Dallas, for appellee.
HUGHES, Justice.
H. S. Jack, Sr., appellee, doing business under the name of Dayton Pop-up Sprinkling Systems of Dallas, sued appellants, B. A. and L. Sidney Stufflebeme, for breach of a written contract to pay appellee for repairs made by him on sprinkling systems installed by appellants in Dallas. The form of the suit…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cochran v. Wool Growers Central Storage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- Simonds v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
- Hunter v. Gulf Production Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Hoffer v. Eastland Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Childress v. First State Bank of BarnhartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.