Legal Opinion

In Re Will of Plott

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

The propounders assign as error the ruling of the court below in admitting, over their objection, the following evidence from the witness Zeb Plott, who was one of the caveators and interested in the result: “Q. What, if anything, did she (testatrix) tell you then with respect to making a will ? The court: It would only be competent as it may tend to show the execution of the will and her ability to make a will. A. She asked us to move back to the old home place, said, 'Cause Henry and his family had made her will us out and she wanted us to go back to the old home place, she wanted to live…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Will of ChismanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  2. Linebarger v. Linebarger.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. In Re Will of YelvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Bissett v. . BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. In Re Will of FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Wilder v. MedlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API