Valdez v. Hulihan
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.
Pro se petitioner Ramon Valdez (“Valdez”) seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“ § 2254”). In opposition to Valdez’s petition, respondent William F. Hulihan argues that Valdez was not “in custody” at the time he filed his petition, as required by § 2254.
After a jury found Valdez guilty of Grand Larceny in the Fourth Degree, in violation of New York Penal Law § 155.30(5), the New York State Supreme Court, New York County, entered a Judgment of Conviction on May 8, 2001, sentencing him to an indeterminate term of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lackawanna County District Attorney v. CossSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Albritton v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
- Blanding v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Cantey v. JacobsenDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020
- Carrenard v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Derek Sloane v. Michael DayeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.