Legal Opinion

Valdez v. Hulihan

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 5, 2009No. 09 Civ. 1519(VM)PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.

Pro se petitioner Ramon Valdez (“Valdez”) seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“ § 2254”). In opposition to Valdez’s petition, respondent William F. Hulihan argues that Valdez was not “in custody” at the time he filed his petition, as required by § 2254.

After a jury found Valdez guilty of Grand Larceny in the Fourth Degree, in violation of New York Penal Law § 155.30(5), the New York State Supreme Court, New York County, entered a Judgment of Conviction on May 8, 2001, sentencing him to an indeterminate term of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Lackawanna County District Attorney v. CossSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Albritton v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
  2. Blanding v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
  3. Cantey v. JacobsenDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020
  4. Carrenard v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  5. Derek Sloane v. Michael DayeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API