Legal Opinion

Gillispie v. Timmerman-Cooper

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided December 15, 2011No. Case No. 3:09-cv-471PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

MICHAEL R. MERZ, United States Magistrate Judge.

This is a habeas corpus action brought by Petitioner Roger Dean Gillispie pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 seeking relief from his convictions for nine counts of rape with firearm specifications, three counts of kidnaping with firearm specifications, three counts of gross sexual imposition, and one count of aggravated robbery with a firearm specification and resulting sentences which total twenty-two to fifty-six years.

The parties have consented to plenary magistrate judge jurisdiction…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re Motors Liquidation Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  2. State v. GillispieOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Roger Gillispie v. Miami Twp., OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  4. Gillispie v. Wilmington Trust Co. (In re Motors Liquidation Co.)District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  5. State v. GillispieOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API