Legal Opinion

Maxsted v. Department of Motor Vehicles

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 1971No. Civ. 36755PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment granting a peremptory writ of mandate directing appellant to vacate its action suspending respondent’s driver’s license for failure to submit to a blood, breath, or urine test as required by the implied consent law of the State of California (Veh. Code, § 13353). We reverse the judgment and direct that the trial court deny the writ.

Facts

Read in the light most favorable to the findings of fact of the trial court, the record reveals the following. On July 10, 1969, respondent was lawfully arrested by police officers of the City of Long Beach…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bush v. BrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Kesler v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Rust v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Walker v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Kingston v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Agnew v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Wiseman v. SullivanNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. McDonnell v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Cahall v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Goodman v. OrrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API