Legal Opinion

Gammans v. Roussell

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1879No. 914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Second Judicial District, Washoe County. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Leonard, J.:

This is an action to determine the ownership and right of possession of an undivided one-sixtli part of a certain water-ditch known as the “big ditch,” in Washoe county. The case was tried by the court without a jury. The findings were all in favor of the defendants, who had judgment against plaintiff upon the merits and for their costs.

Plaintiff moved for a new trial on the grounds, first, that the findings of the court were notsustained by the evidence; second, that the judgment -was against law and the evidence; third, error in law occurring at the trial and…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Varnum v. GradyNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Imperial Palace v. DawsonNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Love v. Mt. Oddie United Mines Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Padilla v. MasonNevada Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API