McCullough Appliance, Inc. v. Suit
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
YATES, Judge.
This ease arises from a car accident involving Edward Andy Suit, his minor son David E. Suit, and an employee of McCullough Appliance, Inc. (McCullough). Following a jury trial, a verdict was returned awarding Edward Suit $2,250 in damages and David Suit $1,150 in damages. The Suits then filed a motion for a new trial, on the grounds that the jury verdict was against the weight and preponderance of the evidence, and contrary to the law in the case. The motion for a new trial was granted; hence, this appeal by McCullough.
The record revealed the following: The accident occurred on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stinson v. Acme Propane Gas Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Senn v. Alabama Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Nemec v. HarrisCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- Franklin v. CannonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Whisenant v. NATIONWIDE MUT. FIRE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. DarringCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
- Wood v. CourtneyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- Wood v. CourtneyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- Wood v. CourtneyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005