Legal Opinion
Whisenant v. NATIONWIDE MUT. FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 29, 1991No. 89-1839PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Katherine Whisenant and her husband, Herman Whisenant, sued their insurance carrier, Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company (hereinafter "Nationwide"), based on the uninsured motorist provision of their automobile insurance policy, claiming damages arising out of two alleged automobile accidents. Mrs. Whisenant's claim was based on alleged personal injuries sustained in both accidents, and Mr. Whisenant's claim was based on an alleged loss of consortium resulting from his wife's injuries in both accidents and on personal injuries allegedly sustained in the second accident. The jury returned…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bussey v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Charter Hosp. of Mobile v. WeinbergSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Sparks v. MilliganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Slay v. McKean Paint and Hardware Store, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
3Cited by16 opinions
- Henderson by Hartsfield v. Alabama PowerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- White Consol. Ind. v. American LibertySupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Grayson v. DunganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Newman v. Bankers Fidelity Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Wherry v. State Ex Rel. BrooksCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.