Legal Opinion

City of McAllen v. De La Garza

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1995No. 94-1139PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, Justice

in which PHILLIPS, Chief Justice, GONZALEZ, HIGHTOWER, HECHT, GAMMAGE, and ENOCH, Justices, join.

This case presents the question whether the owner of a caliche pit has a duty to make the pit safe for or to warn those who are not traveling with reasonable care upon the adjoining highway. We hold there is no duty.

On May 27, 1989, Robert Garza and his sixteen-year old passenger Aaron De La *810Garza were traveling on a straight, two-lane, paved road, twenty-two feet wide, with unimproved shoulders and no center stripe. A caliche pit approximately thirty feet deep abuts this road, and in some places…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Alamo National Bank v. KrausTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. City of Fort Worth v. Lee, GuardianTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Atchison v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Kavanaugh v. Midwest Club, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Afarian v. Massachusetts Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  2. Gorrell v. Texas Utilities Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. City of Dallas v. Giraldo, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  4. Military Highway Water Supply Corp. v. MorinTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Military Highway Water Supply Corp. v. Morin, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API