Legal Opinion
Moore v. AT & T Latin America Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 29, 2001No. 01 C 3013PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PLUNKETT, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs Paul A. Moore and Phillip S. Magiera (collectively referred to as plaintiffs) have filed a four-count complaint against AT & T Latin America Corporation (AT & T Latin) alleging breach of contract and seeking a declaratory judgment. AT & T Latin has moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. (Rule) 12(b)(3) on the basis of improper venue or, assuming we find venue is proper in this district, to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida pursuant to 28…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Margaret E. Coffey v. Van Dorn Iron Works, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Heller Financial, Inc. v. Riverdale Auto Parts, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Midwest Precision Services, Inc. v. PTM Industries Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- Dunn v. Soo Line RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- Pasulka v. SykesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
3Cited by17 opinions
- Audi AG & Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. IzumiDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- Reilly v. MeffeDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
- Davis v. American Society of Civil EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Cooper v. Farmers New Century InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Botello v. Illinois Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.