Legal Opinion
Matousek v. South Dakota Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 3, 1990No. 16701PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
ACTION
Lynette Matousek appeals a summary judgment in fayor of South Dakota Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company (insurer) in her lawsuit on behalf of the estate of Robert Matousek for supplemental death benefits under an automobile insurance policy. We affirm.
FACTS
Robert Matousek was employed as a semi-truck driver and, at the time of his death, lived with his wife Lynette in Co-lóme, South Dakota. In December 1986 Robert purchased a Chrysler automobile and contacted Darrel Pochop (Pochop), an agent for insurer, requesting that he compute the premium for full insurance coverage on the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bego v. GordonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- State Automobile Mutual Insurance v. BabcockMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- National Emblem Insurance Co. v. RiosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Howell v. United States Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- North American Specialty Insurance Company v. Shirley MyersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- North American Specialty Insurance v. Myers ex rel. Estate of MyersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Underwriters at Lloyds London v. STD Enterprises, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
- Pine Ridge Realty, Inc. v. Massachusetts Bay InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Acadia Insurance v. Allied Marine Transport LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.