Leal v. Mohr

Leal asserts in his second proposition of law that the court of appeals erred in upholding his parole revocation. Habeas corpus will lie in certain extraordinary circumstances where there is an unlawful restraint of a *173person’s liberty if there is no adequate legal remedy. State ex rel. Pirman v. Money (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 591, 593, 635 N.E.2d 26, 29.

Leal contends that the APA improperly revoked his parole because the APA presented no evidence at the revocation hearing that he had violated his parole. Appellees, however, submitted evidence by affidavit of the APA hearing officer and exhibits…