Lancaster Housing Authority v. Gardner
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Mr. Justice Roberts:
1 believe that the judgment can and should be stricken on existing state law grounds that pre-date and are unrelated to the decision in Thorpe. Thus I dissent from the majority opinion which merely remands for a hearing under Thorpe.
Appellee-authority proceeded under a lease provision which allowed confession of judgment against appellant-tenant “upon the breach of any of the covenants or Agreements of this lease or upon termination thereof by forfeiture, default or expiration. . . .” The authority’s affidavit supporting its entry of the confessed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- West Penn Sand & Gravel Co. v. Shippingport Sand Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Kolf v. LiebermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Scott Factors, Inc. v. HartleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Yezbak v. CroceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.