Koehring v. Bowman

This was an action by appellant to recover on a contract with the appellee, Guy E. Bowman, and to foreclose a mechanic’s lien upon a dwelling occupied by said appellee and his wife, for the value of a furnace installed therein pursuant to said con*435tract. Appellant recovered a personal judgment against said Guy E. Bowman for the agreed price of the furnace, but was denied a lien.

Overruling the motion for a new trial is assigned as error, under which appellant complains of the refusal to admit in evidence his notice of a mechanic’s lien. It was proved, without dispute, that appellees were…